Tag Archives: legend

Legendary Days and Holidays

A Reader writes:

I’m listening to the podcast on Buddhist Christmas, and I just wanted to add one thing. Technically, Christmas is not a Christian holiday. It started in Germany from a saint (Nicholas) who gave out presents to orphans. And if you do scientific research, you can figure out that there is no evidence to when Jesus was born. The census from that time wasn’t until the spring and they have no birth record of Jesus. They just have the bible that says people were there. But it doesn’t say when (not that I have found). Just adding my input. Thank you for the podcasts and what you have done.

My response:

There’s not exactly a question there, but I can respond anyway. As far as I know, what you say is true. I don’t know of any Christians who really think December 25th is Jesus’ birthday. There may be some; it doesn’t matter. The best info I’ve heard was that Jesus was actually born in the summer. That theory also makes a load of assumptions, but seems more realistic than December 25th.

Buddha’s birthday is on May 6th in 2014, and it’s celebrated each year by Buddhists around the world. It’s not on the same date every year though, since calendar systems in ancient China don’t match up well to our current, more accurate system. It’s complicated, and the changes in calendar systems over the millennia don’t help clarify the facts. Does it really matter though?

The bottom line is that details like these don’t matter. Buddha didn’t ask us to celebrate his birthday; neither did Jesus for that matter. It’s just a thing we’ve chosen to do out of respect, or the need to celebrate, or something like that. Both these characters have gotten to the point where, despite the facts and truth, have become essentially legendary characters. Facts don’t matter so much with legends; what they said and did is what’s important.

Buddha’s Ghostwriters and Hinduism

————————————————————————————————————
A Reader recently wrote:
————————————————————————————————————

I wish to know if buddhist philosophy was actually codified by The Budda himself or by some other saint like Nagarjuna later?

The Buddhist philosophy, i think, is actually based on the vedic philosophy in terms of rebirth and salvation defined as coming out the cycle of rebirths but does not follow the vedic tradition. hence this interest in the origins of the philosophy. I am more interested in knowing how Buddhism is close to Hinduism. somehow I like to believe Buddha as the ninth incarnation of Vishu in the ten incarnations of Vishu.

I have heard that Buddha refusing to answer questions about the vedic philosopy and recommended his followers to follow vedas only if they understand. is it so?

————————————————————————————————————
My Response:
————————————————————————————————————

DISCLAIMER: My opinion follows, there are going to be dissenters whenever verifiable fact competes with faith.

I will admit right now that my knowledge of Hinduism is nowhere near that of Buddhism. To my knowledge, the Vedas (one of the Hindu ‚Äúscriptures‚Äù) did advocate an escape from Samsara (the cycle of rebirth), but I know they had definite ideas of Heaven and Hell, which Buddhism does not support (for the most part). Buddhism has always been a bit vague about exactly what happens when one reaches Nirvana. Generally speaking, yes, much of the “religious” side of Buddhism came straight from Hinduism.

Buddha never codified anything himself as far as I am aware. According to legend, his words were written down just after his death, although more probably the first writings were collected over a long period of time after his death. Very little of what is attributed to Buddha is verifiable– remember that this was a VERY long time ago, and modern scholars aren’t even in agreement about the CENTURY in which Buddha lived. In my admittedly academically slanted opinion, he almost certainly came up with the 4 Noble Truths and Eightfold Path himself, but beyond that, I wouldn’t bet on anything. Still, the words of the later authors ring true, so they are of value whether Buddha actually said them or not.

With all Buddhist doctrine and texts, weigh the words yourself and believe what makes sense to you. Remember the basic POINT of Buddhism: You aren’t trying to please any kind of god or supreme being, you are trying to reach a very personal goal of Enlightenment. Use what works for you and give up what seems unbelievable. You should keep on reading and learning, however, so you are better able to make informed decisions whether to accept or disregard parts of the doctrine. Bear in mind, that not all sects of Buddhism will agree with me on this; some are very doctrinal and strict.

Buddha (or someone writing in his name) is said to have refused to answer questions about “religious” topics, such as the existence of god(s), afterlife, magic, and so forth. He stated that there was simply no way to experience those things firsthand, so there was no way to know for certain about them; anything else would be speculation and a waste of time.

Maybe someday I’ll do a multi-part series on Hinduism; it’ll give me a chance to get back up to speed on that material. Is there any interest in the subject?